hollymath: (Default)
[personal profile] hollymath
This is so obvious but I don't think I've read about it anywhere.

It's pretty well understood in my circles, which involve a lot of disabled people and a lot of politics people, that disabled people get a lot of shit from the DWP.

Very few people realize how strikingly similar am experience immigrants can have in dealing with the Home Office.

There really are a lot of parallels. Look at this Guardian article I read today:

It starts right in the subhead.
the Home Office is driven not by reason but by keeping numbers down.
And it just goes on.
Not only is the Home Office understaffed and under-resourced as the result of public sector cuts, it is also under pressure to deliver whatever results the government needs to stand any chance of meeting its immigration targets
...
The guiding Home Office principle seems to be reject first, ask questions later, and in the meantime hope the applicant does not have the connections or resources to appeal. Immigration lawyers have told me that officials were at one point being incentivised, on the basis of how many applications they rejected, with Marks & Spencer vouchers.
...
the Home Office in particular, and the immigration system in general, has long made decisions not on the basis of merit or reason, but as a way of filtering out as many applicants as possible – either via exhaustion of resources or impossibly high barriers.
...
If the waiting or the rejections or the appeals don’t exhaust the anxious applicant, the costs involved in protecting themselves from the relentless machine surely will.
...
Already there are reports of EU citizens being questioned about their right to use the NHS, and concerns about poor and elderly people who may struggle to fortify themselves against whatever ultimate decision will be made about their status.
...
these deficiencies yield great consequences for ordinary people who suffer when a bureaucracy turns brutal. It has also revealed the extent to which immigration law is damaged by populist thinking and underfunding.
Having tried and mostly failed to get blood out of the stone that is the DWP, I don't relish dealing with another system that is similar in any way (and I heartily wish I'd been able to do this while Andrew still had a steady and quite healthy income, because I'm terrified of how expensive this could be... I know I Kickstarted the money for the application fee but, as this article alludes, anything that doesn't go perfectly smoothly will cost a lot more).

But now that Christmas is out of the way and I have a nice long stretch ahead of me where I don't expect to need my passport, it's time to put the final touches on my citizenship application and send it off.

(no subject)

Date: 2017-01-12 04:07 am (UTC)
subbes: A picture of me wearing a red shirt, circa 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] subbes
let me know if you need a 1:1 ear to complain about the hideous bureaucracy of immigration & citizenship. i looked at the steps to bring my (US) spouse over as the family member of a citizen - should I flee Peesident T and return to the UK - and I'm still mad about it.

(no subject)

Date: 2017-01-12 06:11 pm (UTC)
subbes: A picture of me wearing a red shirt, circa 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] subbes

No problem. I can give you my Signal details (if you don't use Signal, check it out - end to end encrypted messages! I use it instead of SMS whenever I can now).

(no subject)

Date: 2017-01-12 01:51 pm (UTC)
nanila: me (Default)
From: [personal profile] nanila
Good luck with it. If you need any practical help (e.g. review of application) please let me know - it wasn't that long ago that I did it.

Profile

hollymath: (Default)
Holly

February 2017

S M T W T F S
   123 4
5678 91011
12131415 16 17 18
19202122232425
262728    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags